Experiencing a cyberattack is no longer an exceptional scenario. Companies, independent professionals and even public administrations increasingly face security incidents that can affect data, operations, reputation and business continuity.
Faced with this situation, a recurring question arises: is it better to disclose the incident or try to manage it discreetly?
The answer is clear from both a legal standpoint and a reputational management perspective: concealing an incident rarely protects an organization and can seriously worsen its consequences.
First Step: Contain, Analyze and Document
Before any external communication, the technical priority is clear: contain the incident, preserve evidence and assess the scope. This involves isolating affected systems, activating response plans, collecting logs, identifying attack vectors and determining whether data exfiltration or operational impact has occurred.
Accurate documentation of the incident will be essential both for technical recovery and for potential regulatory audits, legal claims or activation of cyber insurance policies.
The European and French Legal Framework Often Requires Notification
In Europe, the General Data Protection Regulation establishes that any personal data breach that poses a risk to individuals’ rights and freedoms must be reported to the competent authority within a maximum of 72 hours after becoming aware of the incident. In France, this authority is the CNIL.
Additionally, the NIS2 Directive and French legislation on network and information system security extend notification obligations to companies considered essential or important, including technology, healthcare, finance, energy, transport sectors and digital service providers.
Failure to comply with these obligations may lead to significant financial penalties, mandatory audits, operational restrictions and even civil liability if third parties are harmed.
Sanctions for Concealing Incidents
Sanctions vary depending on the severity and type of infringement, but in data protection matters they can reach substantial percentages of global annual turnover. Beyond the fine itself, concealing an incident often damages trust among customers, partners and investors once it eventually becomes known, which happens frequently.
From a regulatory perspective, attempted concealment may be considered an aggravating factor, especially if there was a legal obligation to report or if communication was deliberately delayed.
When the Law Clearly Requires Disclosure
In practical terms, there are three main scenarios where notification is usually mandatory:
- If personal data belonging to customers, employees or users has been compromised. This includes leaks, unauthorized access or loss of sensitive information.
- If the attack affects essential services or critical infrastructure, or may impact the operational continuity of third parties.
- If there is significant risk to individual rights, corporate reputation or economic stability resulting from the incident.
In these cases, informing is not merely advisable; it is a legal obligation.
When It May Be Managed Internally
Not all incidents require public or regulatory disclosure. For example, intrusion attempts blocked without effective access, internal incidents without data exposure, or technical failures quickly corrected without external impact may be handled within the internal security management framework.
Even so, it remains advisable to document the incident, strengthen controls and review security policies to prevent recurrence.
Good Communication Protects Reputation
Contrary to what many organizations believe, communicating an incident with controlled transparency often strengthens credibility. Customers and partners understand that no system is invulnerable; what they truly evaluate is how the crisis is handled.
Clear communication, without alarmism but honest, combined with corrective measures and a demonstrated commitment to security, can turn an incident into an opportunity to show organizational maturity.
We are a technological innovation company specializing in cybersecurity, computer networks, and advanced digital solutions. Through audits, consulting, and design, we develop and manage critical infrastructures, combining technical expertise, international certifications, and cutting-edge research and development methodologies.
Our multidisciplinary team integrates engineering, risk analysis, auditing, and systems development to deliver comprehensive solutions tailored to complex environments. Each project is approached with technical rigor, precision, and a focus on resilience, efficiency, and operational security.
Prior Preparation: The Key Differentiator
Organizations that manage cyberattacks most effectively usually already have:
- Formal incident response plans
- Defined legal and regulatory protocols
- Prepared technical teams or specialized partners
- Crisis communication strategy
- Regular simulation exercises
It is not only about preventing attacks, but about being prepared to respond properly when they occur.
Conclusion
Concealing a cyberattack is rarely the best option. European and French regulations require transparency in many cases, and experience shows that professional management combined with appropriate communication reduces legal, financial and reputational risks.
The question should no longer be whether to disclose or not, but how to do it correctly, when to do it and under what strategy to protect both the organization and the people affected.
* Personal information will be encrypted
